Chapter 01 Number Systems
1.1 Introduction
In your earlier classes, you have learnt about the number line and how to represent various types of numbers on it (see Fig. 1.1).

Fig. 1.1 : The number line
Just imagine you start from zero and go on walking along this number line in the positive direction. As far as your eyes can see, there are numbers, numbers and numbers!

Fig. 1.2
Now suppose you start walking along the number line, and collecting some of the numbers. Get a bag ready to store them!
You might begin with picking up only natural numbers like 1,2,3, and so on. You know that this list goes on for ever. (Why is this true?) So, now your bag contains infinitely many natural numbers! Recall that we denote this collection by the symbol

Now turn and walk all the way back, pick up zero and put it into the bag. You now have the collection of whole numbers which is denoted by the symbol

Now, stretching in front of you are many, many negative integers. Put all the negative integers into your bag. What is your new collection? Recall that it is the collection of all integers, and it is denoted by the symbol

Are there some numbers still left on the line? Of course! There are numbers like

The collection of rational numbers is denoted by
You may recall the definition of rational numbers:
A number ’
Notice that all the numbers now in the bag can be written in the form
Now, let us solve some examples about the different types of numbers, which you have studied in earlier classes.
Example 1 : Are the following statements true or false? Give reasons for your answers.
(i) Every whole number is a natural number.
(ii) Every integer is a rational number.
(iii) Every rational number is an integer.
Solution :(i) False, because zero is a whole number but not a natural number.
(ii) True, because every integer
Example 2 : Find five rational numbers between 1 and 2.
We can approach this problem in at least two ways.
Solution 1 : Recall that to find a rational number between
Solution 2 : The other option is to find all the five rational numbers in one step. Since we want five numbers, we write 1 and 2 as rational numbers with denominator
Remark: Notice that in Example 2, you were asked to find five rational numbers between 1 and 2. But, you must have realised that in fact there are infinitely many rational numbers between 1 and 2 . In general, there are infinitely many rational numbers between any two given rational numbers. Let us take a look at the number line again. Have you picked up all the numbers? Not, yet. The fact is that there are infinitely many more numbers left on the number line! There are gaps in between the places of the numbers you picked up, and not just one or two but infinitely many. The amazing thing is that there are infinitely many numbers lying between any two of these gaps too!
So we are left with the following questions:
-
What are the numbers, that are left on the number line, called?
-
How do we recognise them? That is, how do we distinguish them from the rationals (rational numbers)?
These questions will be answered in the next section.

1.2 Irrational Numbers
We saw, in the previous section, that there may be numbers on the number line that are not rationals. In this section, we are going to investigate these numbers. So far, all
the numbers you have come across, are of the form
The Pythagoreans in Greece, followers of the famous mathematician and philosopher Pythagoras, were the first to discover the numbers which were not rationals, around
. These numbers are called irrational numbers (irrationals), because they cannot be written in the form of a ratio of integers. There are many myths surrounding the discovery of irrational numbers by the Pythagorean, Hippacus of Croton. In all the myths, Hippacus has an unfortunate end, either for discovering that is irrational or for disclosing the secret about to people outside the secret Pythagorean sect! ![]()
Pythagoras
(569 BCE - 479 BCE)
Fig. 1.3
Let us formally define these numbers.
A number ’
You already know that there are infinitely many rationals. It turns out that there are infinitely many irrational numbers too. Some examples are:
Remark : Recall that when we use the symbol
Some of the irrational numbers listed above are familiar to you. For example, you have already come across many of the square roots listed above and the number
The Pythagoreans proved that
Let us return to the questions raised at the end of the previous section. Remember the bag of rational numbers. If we now put all irrational numbers into the bag, will there be any number left on the number line? The answer is no! It turns out that the collection of all rational numbers and irrational numbers together make up what we call the collection of real numbers,

which is denoted by
![]()
R. Dedekind (1831-1916)
Fig. 1.4
In the 1870 s two German mathematicians, Cantor and Dedekind, showed that : Corresponding to every real number, there is a point on the real number line, and corresponding to every point on the number line, there exists a unique real number.
![]()
G. Cantor (1845-1918) Fig. 1.5
Let us see how we can locate some of the irrational numbers on the number line.
Example 3 : Locate
Solution : It is easy to see how the Greeks might have discovered

Fig. 1.6 This is easy. Transfer Fig. 1.6 onto the number line making sure that the vertex

Fig. 1.7
We have just seen that
Example 4 : Locate
Solution : Let us return to Fig. 1.7.

Fig. 1.8
Construct
In the same way, you can locate
EXERCISE 1.2
1. State whether the following statements are true or false. Justify your answers.
(i) Every irrational number is a real number.
(ii) Every point on the number line is of the form
(iii) Every real number is an irrational number.
Show Answer
Solution
(i) True; since the collection of real numbers is made up of rational and irrational numbers.
(ii) False; as negative numbers cannot be expressed as the square root of any other number.
(iii) False; as real numbers include both rational and irrational numbers. Therefore, every real number cannot be an irrational number.
2. Are the square roots of all positive integers irrational? If not, give an example of the square root of a number that is a rational number.
Show Answer
Solution
If numbers such as
3. Show how
Show Answer
Solution
We know that,
Show howAnd,

Mark a point ’
C is representing
4. Classroom activity (Constructing the ‘square root spiral’) : Take a large sheet of paper and construct the ‘square root spiral’ in the following fashion. Start with a point

Fig. 1.9 : Constructing square root spiral drawing a line segment of unit length perpendicular to
Show Answer
Solution
Construct the “square root spiral”.
Step 1. On a large sheet of paper, mark a point
Step 2. Draw a line segment
Here,
Step 3. Draw a line segment
Here,
Hence, the ‘square root spiral’ is constructed.
1.3 Real Numbers and their Decimal Expansions
In this section, we are going to study rational and irrational numbers from a different point of view. We will look at the decimal expansions of real numbers and see if we can use the expansions to distinguish between rationals and irrationals. We will also explain how to visualise the representation of real numbers on the number line using their decimal expansions. Since rationals are more familiar to us, let us start with
them. Let us take three examples :
Example 5 : Find the decimal expansions of
Solution :

Remainders :
Remainders :
Divisor : 7
What have you noticed? You should have noticed at least three things:
(i) The remainders either become 0 after a certain stage, or start repeating themselves.
(ii) The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in
(iii) If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (for
Although we have noticed this pattern using only the examples above, it is true for all rationals of the form
Case (i) : The remainder becomes zero
In the example of
Case (ii) : The remainder never becomes zero
In the examples of
The usual way of showing that 3 repeats in the quotient of
Thus, we see that the decimal expansion of rational numbers have only two choices: either they are terminating or non-terminating recurring.
Now suppose, on the other hand, on your walk on the number line, you come across a number like 3.142678 whose decimal expansion is terminating or a number like
We will not prove it but illustrate this fact with a few examples. The terminating cases are easy.
Example 6 : Show that 3.142678 is a rational number. In other words, express 3.142678 in the form
Solution : We have
Now, let us consider the case when the decimal expansion is non-terminating recurring.
Example 7 : Show that
Solution : Since we do not know what
Now here is where the trick comes in. Look at Now,
Therefore,
Solving for
Example 8 : Show that
Solution : Let
So,
Therefore,
i.e.,
You can check the reverse that
Example 9 : Show that
Solution : Let
So,
Therefore,
i.e.,
You can also check the reverse that
So, every number with a non-terminating recurring decimal expansion can be expressed in the form
The decimal expansion of a rational number is either terminating or nonterminating recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is terminating or non-terminating recurring is rational.
So, now we know what the decimal expansion of a rational number can be. What about the decimal expansion of irrational numbers? Because of the property above, we can conclude that their decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring. So, the property for irrational numbers, similar to the property stated above for rational numbers, is
The decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-terminating non-recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is non-terminating non-recurring is irrational.
Recall
What about the famous irrationals
(Note that, we often take
Over the years, mathematicians have developed various techniques to produce more and more digits in the decimal expansions of irrational numbers. For example, you might have learnt to find digits in the decimal expansion of
Notice that it is the same as the one given above for the first five decimal places. The history of the hunt for digits in the decimal expansion of
The Greek genius Archimedes was the first to compute digits in the decimal expansion of
. He showed 3.140845 . Aryabhatta ( C.E. , the great Indian mathematician and astronomer, found the value of correct to four decimal places (3.1416). Using high speed computers and advanced algorithms, has been computed to over 1.24 trillion decimal places! ![]()
Archimedes (287 BCE-212 BCE)
Fig. 1.10
Now, let us see how to obtain irrational numbers.
Example 10 : Find an irrational number between
Solution : We saw that
To find an irrational number between
An example of such a number is
EXERCISE 1.3
1. Write the following in decimal form and say what kind of decimal expansion each has :
(i)
(iv)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
Terminating
(ii)
Non-terminating repeating
(iii)
Terminating
(iv)
Non-terminating repeating
(v)
Non-terminating repeating
(vi)
Terminating
2. You know that
[Hint : Study the remainders while finding the value of
Show Answer
Solution
Yes. It can be done as follows.
, where
3. Express the following in the form
(i)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
Let
4. Express
Show Answer
Solution
Let
=1
5. What can the maximum number of digits be in the repeating block of digits in the decimal expansion of
Show Answer
Solution
It can be observed that,
There are 16 digits in the repeating block of the decimal expansion of
6. Look at several examples of rational numbers in the form
Show Answer
Solution
Terminating decimal expansion will occur when denominator
It can be observed that terminating decimal may be obtained in the situation where prime factorisation of the denominator of the given fractions has the power of 2 only or 5 only or both.
7. Write three numbers whose decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring.
Show Answer
Solution
3 numbers whose decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring are as follows.
8. Find three different irrational numbers between the rational numbers
Show Answer
Solution
3 irrational numbers are as follows.
9. Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational :
(i)
Show Answer
Solution
As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it
is an irrational number.
(ii)
It is a rational number as it can be represented in
(iii) 0.3796
As the decimal expansion of this number is terminating, therefore, it is a rational number.
(iv)
As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating recurring, therefore, it is a rational number.
(v)
As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating non-repeating, therefore, it is an irrational number.
1.4 Operations on Real Numbers
You have learnt, in earlier classes, that rational numbers satisfy the commutative, associative and distributive laws for addition and multiplication. Moreover, if we add, subtract, multiply or divide (except by zero) two rational numbers, we still get a rational number (that is, rational numbers are ‘closed’ with respect to addition, subtraction, multiplication and division). It turns out that irrational numbers also satisfy the commutative, associative and distributive laws for addition and multiplication. However, the sum, difference, quotients and products of irrational numbers are not always irrational. For example,
Let us look at what happens when we add and multiply a rational number with an irrational number. For example,
Example 11 : Check whether
Solution :
Then
All these are non-terminating non-recurring decimals. So, all these are irrational numbers.
Example 12 : Add
Solution :
Example 13 : Multiply
Solution :
Example 14 : Divide
Solution :
These examples may lead you to expect the following facts, which are true:
(i) The sum or difference of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.
(ii) The product or quotient of a non-zero rational number with an irrational number is irrational.
(iii) If we add, subtract, multiply or divide two irrationals, the result may be rational or irrational.
We now turn our attention to the operation of taking square roots of real numbers.
Recall that, if
Let
In Section 1.2, we saw how to represent

Fig. 1.11
Mark the distance 3.5 units from a fixed point
More generally, to find

Fig. 1.12
Notice that, in Fig. 1.12,
Therefore,
Now,
So, by the Pythagoras Theorem, we have
This shows that
This construction gives us a visual, and geometric way of showing that

Fig. 1.13
We would like to now extend the idea of square roots to cube roots, fourth roots, and in general
What is
From these examples, can you define
Let
We now list some identities relating to square roots, which are useful in various ways. You are already familiar with some of these from your earlier classes. The remaining ones follow from the distributive law of multiplication over addition of real numbers, and from the identity
Let
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Let us look at some particular cases of these identities.
Example 15 : Simplify the following expressions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Solution : (i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Remark : Note that ‘simplify’ in the example above has been used to mean that the expression should be written as the sum of a rational and an irrational number.
We end this section by considering the following problem. Look at
Example 16 : Rationalise the denominator of
Solution : We want to write
In this form, it is easy to locate
Example 17 : Rationalise the denominator of
Solution : We use the Identity (iv) given earlier. Multiply and divide
Example 18 : Rationalise the denominator of
Solution : Here we use the Identity (iii) given earlier.
So,
Example 19 : Rationalise the denominator of
Solution :
So, when the denominator of an expression contains a term with a square root (or a number under a radical sign), the process of converting it to an equivalent expression whose denominator is a rational number is called rationalising the denominator.
EXERCISE 1.4
1. Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number.
(ii)
As it can be represented in
(iii)
(iv)
As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number. (
As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number.
2. Simplify each of the following expressions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Show Answer
Solution
3. Recall,
Show Answer
Solution
There is no contradiction. When we measure a length with scale or any other instrument, we only obtain an approximate rational value. We never obtain an exact value. For this reason, we may not realise that either
the
4. Represent
Show Answer
Solution
Mark a line segment

(i)
perpendicular to line
Taking B as centre and BE as radius, draw an arc in tersecting number line at
5. Rationalise the denominators of the following:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
(ii)
1.5 Laws of Exponents for Real Numbers
Do you remember how to simplify the following?
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Did you get these answers? They are as follows:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
To get these answers, you would have used the following laws of exponents, which you have learnt in your earlier classes. (Here
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
What is
So, for example :
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Suppose we want to do the following computations:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
How would we go about it? It turns out that we can extend the laws of exponents that we have studied earlier, even when the base is a positive real number and the exponents are rational numbers. (Later you will study that it can further to be extended when the exponents are real numbers.) But before we state these laws, and to even make sense of these laws, we need to first understand what, for example
We define
Let
In the language of exponents, we define
Therefore, we have the following definition:
Let
We now have the following extended laws of exponents:
Let
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
You can now use these laws to answer the questions asked earlier.
Example 20 : Simplify (i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Solution :
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
EXERCISE 1.5
1. Find :
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
2. Find:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Show Answer
Solution
(ii)
3. Simplify:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Show Answer
Solution
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
1.6 Summary
In this chapter, you have studied the following points:
1. A number
2. A number
3. The decimal expansion of a rational number is either terminating or non-terminating recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is terminating or non-terminating recurring is rational.
4. The decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-terminating non-recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is non-terminating non-recurring is irrational.
5. All the rational and irrational numbers make up the collection of real numbers.
6. If
7. For positive real numbers
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
8. To rationalise the denominator of
9. Let
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)