Chapter 01 Number Systems

1.1 Introduction

In your earlier classes, you have learnt about the number line and how to represent various types of numbers on it (see Fig. 1.1).

Fig. 1.1 : The number line

Just imagine you start from zero and go on walking along this number line in the positive direction. As far as your eyes can see, there are numbers, numbers and numbers!

Fig. 1.2

Now suppose you start walking along the number line, and collecting some of the numbers. Get a bag ready to store them!

You might begin with picking up only natural numbers like 1,2,3, and so on. You know that this list goes on for ever. (Why is this true?) So, now your bag contains infinitely many natural numbers! Recall that we denote this collection by the symbol N.

Now turn and walk all the way back, pick up zero and put it into the bag. You now have the collection of whole numbers which is denoted by the symbol W.

Now, stretching in front of you are many, many negative integers. Put all the negative integers into your bag. What is your new collection? Recall that it is the collection of all integers, and it is denoted by the symbol Z.

Are there some numbers still left on the line? Of course! There are numbers like 12,34, or even 20052006. If you put all such numbers also into the bag, it will now be the collection of rational numbers.

The collection of rational numbers is denoted by Q. ‘Rational’ comes from the word ‘ratio’, and Q comes from the word ‘quotient’.

You may recall the definition of rational numbers:

A number ’ r ’ is called a rational number, if it can be written in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0. (Why do we insist that q0 ?)

Notice that all the numbers now in the bag can be written in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0. For example, -25 can be written as 251; here p=25 and q=1. Therefore, the rational numbers also include the natural numbers, whole numbers and integers. You also know that the rational numbers do not have a unique representation in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0. For example, 12=24=1020=2550 =4794, and so on. These are equivalent rational numbers (or fractions). However, when we say that pq is a rational number, or when we represent pq on the number line, we assume that q0 and that p and q have no common factors other than 1 (that is, p and q are co-prime). So, on the number line, among the infinitely many fractions equivalent to 12, we will choose 12 to represent all of them.

Now, let us solve some examples about the different types of numbers, which you have studied in earlier classes.

Example 1 : Are the following statements true or false? Give reasons for your answers.

(i) Every whole number is a natural number.

(ii) Every integer is a rational number.

(iii) Every rational number is an integer.

Solution :(i) False, because zero is a whole number but not a natural number.

(ii) True, because every integer m can be expressed in the form m1, and so it is a rational number.(iii) False, because 35 is not an integer.

Example 2 : Find five rational numbers between 1 and 2.

We can approach this problem in at least two ways.

Solution 1 : Recall that to find a rational number between r and s, you can add r and s and divide the sum by 2 , that is r+s2 lies between r and s. So, 32 is a number between 1 and 2. You can proceed in this manner to find four more rational numbers between 1 and 2 . These four numbers are 54,118,138 and 74.

Solution 2 : The other option is to find all the five rational numbers in one step. Since we want five numbers, we write 1 and 2 as rational numbers with denominator 5+1, i.e., 1=66 and 2=126. Then you can check that 76,86,96,106 and 116 are all rational numbers between 1 and 2. So, the five numbers are 76,43,32,53 and 116.

Remark: Notice that in Example 2, you were asked to find five rational numbers between 1 and 2. But, you must have realised that in fact there are infinitely many rational numbers between 1 and 2 . In general, there are infinitely many rational numbers between any two given rational numbers. Let us take a look at the number line again. Have you picked up all the numbers? Not, yet. The fact is that there are infinitely many more numbers left on the number line! There are gaps in between the places of the numbers you picked up, and not just one or two but infinitely many. The amazing thing is that there are infinitely many numbers lying between any two of these gaps too!

So we are left with the following questions:

  1. What are the numbers, that are left on the number line, called?

  2. How do we recognise them? That is, how do we distinguish them from the rationals (rational numbers)?

These questions will be answered in the next section.

1.2 Irrational Numbers

We saw, in the previous section, that there may be numbers on the number line that are not rationals. In this section, we are going to investigate these numbers. So far, all the numbers you have come across, are of the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0. So, you may ask: are there numbers which are not of this form? There are indeed such numbers.

The Pythagoreans in Greece, followers of the famous mathematician and philosopher Pythagoras, were the first to discover the numbers which were not rationals, around 400BC. These numbers are called irrational numbers (irrationals), because they cannot be written in the form of a ratio of integers. There are many myths surrounding the discovery of irrational numbers by the Pythagorean, Hippacus of Croton. In all the myths, Hippacus has an unfortunate end, either for discovering that 2 is irrational or for disclosing the secret about 2 to people outside the secret Pythagorean sect!

Pythagoras

(569 BCE - 479 BCE)

Fig. 1.3

Let us formally define these numbers.

A number ’ s ’ is called irrational, if it cannot be written in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

You already know that there are infinitely many rationals. It turns out that there are infinitely many irrational numbers too. Some examples are:

2,3,15,π,0.10110111011110

Remark : Recall that when we use the symbol , we assume that it is the positive square root of the number. So 4=2, though both 2 and -2 are square roots of 4.

Some of the irrational numbers listed above are familiar to you. For example, you have already come across many of the square roots listed above and the number π.

The Pythagoreans proved that 2 is irrational. Later in approximately 425BC, Theodorus of Cyrene showed that 3,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15 and 17 are also irrationals. Proofs of irrationality of 2,3,5, etc., shall be discussed in Class X. As to π, it was known to various cultures for thousands of years, it was proved to be irrational by Lambert and Legendre only in the late 1700 s. In the next section, we will discuss why 0.10110111011110 and π are irrational.

Let us return to the questions raised at the end of the previous section. Remember the bag of rational numbers. If we now put all irrational numbers into the bag, will there be any number left on the number line? The answer is no! It turns out that the collection of all rational numbers and irrational numbers together make up what we call the collection of real numbers,

which is denoted by R. Therefore, a real number is either rational or irrational. So, we can say that every real number is represented by a unique point on the number line. Also, every point on the number line represents a unique real number. This is why we call the number line, the real number line.

R. Dedekind (1831-1916)

Fig. 1.4

In the 1870 s two German mathematicians, Cantor and Dedekind, showed that : Corresponding to every real number, there is a point on the real number line, and corresponding to every point on the number line, there exists a unique real number.

G. Cantor (1845-1918) Fig. 1.5

Let us see how we can locate some of the irrational numbers on the number line.

Example 3 : Locate 2 on the number line.

Solution : It is easy to see how the Greeks might have discovered 2. Consider a square OABC, with each side 1 unit in length (see Fig. 1.6). Then you can see by the Pythagoras theorem that OB=12+12=2. How do we represent 2 on the number line?

Fig. 1.6 This is easy. Transfer Fig. 1.6 onto the number line making sure that the vertex O coincides with zero (see Fig. 1.7).

Fig. 1.7

We have just seen that OB=2. Using a compass with centre O and radius OB, draw an arc intersecting the number line at the point P. Then P corresponds to 2 on the number line.

Example 4 : Locate 3 on the number line.

Solution : Let us return to Fig. 1.7.

Fig. 1.8

Construct BD of unit length perpendicular to OB (as in Fig. 1.8). Then using the Pythagoras theorem, we see that OD=(2)2+12=3. Using a compass, with centre O and radius OD, draw an arc which intersects the number line at the point Q. Then Q corresponds to 3.

In the same way, you can locate n for any positive integer n, after n1 has been located.

EXERCISE 1.2

1. State whether the following statements are true or false. Justify your answers.

(i) Every irrational number is a real number.

(ii) Every point on the number line is of the form m, where m is a natural number.

(iii) Every real number is an irrational number.

Show Answer

Solution

(i) True; since the collection of real numbers is made up of rational and irrational numbers.

(ii) False; as negative numbers cannot be expressed as the square root of any other number.

(iii) False; as real numbers include both rational and irrational numbers. Therefore, every real number cannot be an irrational number.

2. Are the square roots of all positive integers irrational? If not, give an example of the square root of a number that is a rational number.

Show Answer

Solution

If numbers such as 4=2,9=3 are considered,

3. Show how 5 can be represented on the number line.

Show Answer

Solution

We know that,

4=2

5=(2)2+(1)2

Show howAnd,

Mark a point ’ A ’ representing 2 on number line. Now, construct AB of unit length perpendicular to OA. Then, taking O as centre and OB as radius, draw an arc intersecting number line at C.

C is representing 5.

4. Classroom activity (Constructing the ‘square root spiral’) : Take a large sheet of paper and construct the ‘square root spiral’ in the following fashion. Start with a point O and draw a line segment OP1 of unit length. Draw a line segment P1P2 perpendicular to OP1 of unit length (see Fig. 1.9). Now draw a line segment P2P3 perpendicular to OP2. Then draw a line segment P3P4 perpendicular to OP3. Continuing in this manner, you can get the line segment Pn1Pn by

Fig. 1.9 : Constructing square root spiral drawing a line segment of unit length perpendicular to OPn1. In this manner, you will have created the points P2,P3,.,Pn,, and joined them to create a beautiful spiral depicting 2,3,4,

Show Answer

Solution

Construct the “square root spiral”.

Step 1. On a large sheet of paper, mark a point O and draw a line segment OP1 of unit length.

Step 2. Draw a line segment P1P2 perpendicular to OP1 of unit length and join OP2.

Here, OP2 is of length 2 units. As from Pythagoras theorem: (OP2)2=(P1P2)2+(OP1)2

Step 3. Draw a line segment P2P3 perpendicular to OP2 of unit length and join OP3.

Here, OP3 is of length 3 units. As from Pythagoras theorem: (OP3)2=(P2P3)2+(OP2)2 Step 4. Repeat the steps to get the points P4,P5,P6, and join them with O to obtain 4,5,6,

Hence, the ‘square root spiral’ is constructed.

1.3 Real Numbers and their Decimal Expansions

In this section, we are going to study rational and irrational numbers from a different point of view. We will look at the decimal expansions of real numbers and see if we can use the expansions to distinguish between rationals and irrationals. We will also explain how to visualise the representation of real numbers on the number line using their decimal expansions. Since rationals are more familiar to us, let us start with them. Let us take three examples : 103,78,17. Pay special attention to the remainders and see if you can find any pattern.

Example 5 : Find the decimal expansions of 103,78 and 17.

Solution :

Remainders : 1,1,1,1,1 Divisor : 3

Remainders : 6,4,0 Divisor : 8 Remainders: 3,2,6,4,5,1, 3,2,6,4,5,1,

Divisor : 7

What have you noticed? You should have noticed at least three things:

(i) The remainders either become 0 after a certain stage, or start repeating themselves.

(ii) The number of entries in the repeating string of remainders is less than the divisor (in 103 one number repeats itself and the divisor is 3 , in 17 there are six entries 326451 in the repeating string of remainders and 7 is the divisor).

(iii) If the remainders repeat, then we get a repeating block of digits in the quotient (for 103,3 repeats in the quotient and for 17, we get the repeating block 142857 in the quotient).

Although we have noticed this pattern using only the examples above, it is true for all rationals of the form pq(q0). On division of p by q, two main things happen - either the remainder becomes zero or never becomes zero and we get a repeating string of remainders. Let us look at each case separately.

Case (i) : The remainder becomes zero

In the example of 78, we found that the remainder becomes zero after some steps and the decimal expansion of 78=0.875. Other examples are 12=0.5,639250=2.556. In all these cases, the decimal expansion terminates or ends after a finite number of steps. We call the decimal expansion of such numbers terminating.

Case (ii) : The remainder never becomes zero

In the examples of 103 and 17, we notice that the remainders repeat after a certain stage forcing the decimal expansion to go on for ever. In other words, we have a repeating block of digits in the quotient. We say that this expansion is non-terminating recurring. For example, 103=3.3333 and 17=0.142857142857142857

The usual way of showing that 3 repeats in the quotient of 103 is to write it as 3.3. Similarly, since the block of digits 142857 repeats in the quotient of 17, we write 17 as 0.142857, where the bar above the digits indicates the block of digits that repeats. Also 3.57272… can be written as 3.572. So, all these examples give us non-terminating recurring (repeating) decimal expansions.

Thus, we see that the decimal expansion of rational numbers have only two choices: either they are terminating or non-terminating recurring.

Now suppose, on the other hand, on your walk on the number line, you come across a number like 3.142678 whose decimal expansion is terminating or a number like 1.272727 that is, 1.27, whose decimal expansion is non-terminating recurring, can you conclude that it is a rational number? The answer is yes!

We will not prove it but illustrate this fact with a few examples. The terminating cases are easy.

Example 6 : Show that 3.142678 is a rational number. In other words, express 3.142678 in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

Solution : We have 3.142678=31426781000000, and hence is a rational number.

Now, let us consider the case when the decimal expansion is non-terminating recurring.

Example 7 : Show that 0.3333=0.3 can be expressed in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

Solution : Since we do not know what 0.3 is, let us call it ’ x ’ and so

x=0.3333

Now here is where the trick comes in. Look at Now,

10x=10×(0.333)=3.333

3.3333=3+x, since x=0.3333

Therefore,

10x=3+x

Solving for x, we get

9x=3, i.e., x=13

Example 8 : Show that 1.272727=1.27 can be expressed in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

Solution : Let x=1.272727 Since two digits are repeating, we multiply x by 100 to get

So, 100x=127.2727

Therefore,

100x=126+1.272727=126+x

100xx=126$,i.e.,$99x=126

i.e., x=12699=1411

You can check the reverse that 1411=1.27.

Example 9 : Show that 0.2353535=0.235 can be expressed in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

Solution : Let x=0.235. Over here, note that 2 does not repeat, but the block 35 repeats. Since two digits are repeating, we multiply x by 100 to get

100x=23.53535100x=23.3+0.23535=23.3+x99x=23.3

So, Therefore, i.e., 99x=23310, which gives x=233990

You can also check the reverse that 233990=0.235

So, every number with a non-terminating recurring decimal expansion can be expressed in the form pq(q0), where p and q are integers. Let us summarise our results in the following form :

The decimal expansion of a rational number is either terminating or nonterminating recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is terminating or non-terminating recurring is rational.

So, now we know what the decimal expansion of a rational number can be. What about the decimal expansion of irrational numbers? Because of the property above, we can conclude that their decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring. So, the property for irrational numbers, similar to the property stated above for rational numbers, is

The decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-terminating non-recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is non-terminating non-recurring is irrational.

Recall s=0.10110111011110 from the previous section. Notice that it is nonterminating and non-recurring. Therefore, from the property above, it is irrational. Moreover, notice that you can generate infinitely many irrationals similar to s.

What about the famous irrationals 2 and π ? Here are their decimal expansions up to a certain stage.

2=1.4142135623730950488016887242096π=3.14159265358979323846264338327950

(Note that, we often take 227 as an approximate value for π, but π227.)

Over the years, mathematicians have developed various techniques to produce more and more digits in the decimal expansions of irrational numbers. For example, you might have learnt to find digits in the decimal expansion of 2 by the division method. Interestingly, in the Sulbasutras (rules of chord), a mathematical treatise of the Vedic period ( 800BC - 500BC ), you find an approximation of 2 as follows:

2=1+13+(14×13)(134×14×13)=1.4142156

Notice that it is the same as the one given above for the first five decimal places. The history of the hunt for digits in the decimal expansion of π is very interesting.

The Greek genius Archimedes was the first to compute digits in the decimal expansion of π. He showed 3.140845 <π<3.142857. Aryabhatta ( 476550 C.E. ), the great Indian mathematician and astronomer, found the value of π correct to four decimal places (3.1416). Using high speed computers and advanced algorithms, π has been computed to over 1.24 trillion decimal places!

Archimedes (287 BCE-212 BCE)

Fig. 1.10

Now, let us see how to obtain irrational numbers.

Example 10 : Find an irrational number between 17 and 27.

Solution : We saw that 17=0.142857. So, you can easily calculate 27=0.285714.

To find an irrational number between 17 and 27, we find a number which is non-terminating non-recurring lying between them. Of course, you can find infinitely many such numbers.

An example of such a number is 0.150150015000150000

EXERCISE 1.3

1. Write the following in decimal form and say what kind of decimal expansion each has :

(i) 36100 (ii) 111 (iii) 418

(iv) 313 (v) 211 (vi) 329400

Show Answer

Solution

(i) 36100=0.36

Terminating

(ii) 111=0.090909=0.09

Non-terminating repeating

(iii) 418=338=4.125

Terminating

(iv) 313=0.230769230769=0.230769

Non-terminating repeating

(v) 211=0.18181818 =0.18

Non-terminating repeating

(vi) 329400=0.8225

Terminating

2. You know that 17=0.142857. Can you predict what the decimal expansions of 27,37, 47,57,67 are, without actually doing the long division? If so, how?

[Hint : Study the remainders while finding the value of 17 carefully.]

Show Answer

Solution

Yes. It can be done as follows.

27=2×17=2×0.142857=0.28571437=3×17=3×0.142857=0.42857110x=6+x47=4×17=4×0.142857=0.57142857=5×17=5×0.142857=0.71428567=6×17=6×0.142857=0.857142

, where p and q are integers and q

0.

3. Express the following in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

(i) 0.6 (ii) 0.47 (iii) 0.001

Show Answer

Solution

(i)

0.6=0.666

Let x=0.666

10x=6.666

999x=1

x=1999

4. Express 0.99999 in the form pq. Are you surprised by your answer? With your teacher and classmates discuss why the answer makes sense.

Show Answer

Solution

Let x=0.9999

10x=9.9999

10x=9+x

9x=9x

=1

5. What can the maximum number of digits be in the repeating block of digits in the decimal expansion of 117 ? Perform the division to check your answer.

Show Answer

Solution

It can be observed that,

117=0.0588235294117647

There are 16 digits in the repeating block of the decimal expansion of 117.

6. Look at several examples of rational numbers in the form pq(q0), where p and q are integers with no common factors other than 1 and having terminating decimal representations (expansions). Can you guess what property q must satisfy?

Show Answer

Solution

Terminating decimal expansion will occur when denominator q of rational number pq is either of 2,4,5,8,10, and so on…

94=2.25

118=1.375

275=5.4

It can be observed that terminating decimal may be obtained in the situation where prime factorisation of the denominator of the given fractions has the power of 2 only or 5 only or both.

7. Write three numbers whose decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring.

Show Answer

Solution

3 numbers whose decimal expansions are non-terminating non-recurring are as follows.

0.505005000500005000005

0.72072007200072000072000000.080080008000080000080000008

8. Find three different irrational numbers between the rational numbers 57 and 911.

Show Answer

Solution

57=0.714285

911=0.81

3 irrational numbers are as follows.

0.73073007300073000073

0.750750075000750000750.79079007900079000079

9. Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational :

(i) 23 (ii) 225 (iii) 0.3796 (iv) 7.478478 (v) 1.101001000100001

Show Answer

Solution

As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it

is an irrational number.

(ii)

225=15=151

It is a rational number as it can be represented in pq form.

(iii) 0.3796

As the decimal expansion of this number is terminating, therefore, it is a rational number.

(iv) 7.478478=7.478

As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating recurring, therefore, it is a rational number.

(v) 1.10100100010000

As the decimal expansion of this number is non-terminating non-repeating, therefore, it is an irrational number.

1.4 Operations on Real Numbers

You have learnt, in earlier classes, that rational numbers satisfy the commutative, associative and distributive laws for addition and multiplication. Moreover, if we add, subtract, multiply or divide (except by zero) two rational numbers, we still get a rational number (that is, rational numbers are ‘closed’ with respect to addition, subtraction, multiplication and division). It turns out that irrational numbers also satisfy the commutative, associative and distributive laws for addition and multiplication. However, the sum, difference, quotients and products of irrational numbers are not always irrational. For example, (6)+(6),(2)(2),(3)(3) and 1717 are rationals.

Let us look at what happens when we add and multiply a rational number with an irrational number. For example, 3 is irrational. What about 2+3 and 23 ? Since 3 has a non-terminating non-recurring decimal expansion, the same is true for 2+3 and 23. Therefore, both 2+3 and 23 are also irrational numbers.

Example 11 : Check whether 75,75,2+21,π2 are irrational numbers or not.

Solution : 5=2.236,2=1.4142,π=3.1415

Then 75=15.652,75=7555=755=3.1304

2+21=22.4142,π2=1.1415

All these are non-terminating non-recurring decimals. So, all these are irrational numbers.

Example 12 : Add 22+53 and 233.

Solution : (22+53)+(233)=(22+2)+(5333)

=(2+1)2+(53)3=32+23

Example 13 : Multiply 65 by 25.

Solution : 65×25=6×2×5×5=12×5=60

Example 14 : Divide 815 by 23.

Solution : 815÷23=83×523=45

These examples may lead you to expect the following facts, which are true:

(i) The sum or difference of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.

(ii) The product or quotient of a non-zero rational number with an irrational number is irrational.

(iii) If we add, subtract, multiply or divide two irrationals, the result may be rational or irrational.

We now turn our attention to the operation of taking square roots of real numbers. Recall that, if a is a natural number, then a=b means b2=a and b>0. The same definition can be extended for positive real numbers.

Let a>0 be a real number. Then a=b means b2=a and b>0.

In Section 1.2, we saw how to represent n for any positive integer n on the number line. We now show how to find x for any given positive real number x geometrically. For example, let us find it for x=3.5, i.e., we find 3.5 geometrically.

Fig. 1.11

Mark the distance 3.5 units from a fixed point A on a given line to obtain a point B such that AB=3.5 units (see Fig. 1.11). From B, mark a distance of 1 unit and mark the new point as C. Find the mid-point of AC and mark that point as O. Draw a semicircle with centre O and radius OC. Draw a line perpendicular to AC passing through B and intersecting the semicircle at D. Then, BD=3.5.

More generally, to find x, for any positive real number x, we mark B so that AB=x units, and, as in Fig. 1.12, mark C so that BC=1 unit. Then, as we have done for the case x=3.5, we find BD=x (see Fig. 1.12). We can prove this result using the Pythagoras Theorem.

Fig. 1.12

Notice that, in Fig. 1.12, ΔOBD is a right-angled triangle. Also, the radius of the circle is x+12 units.

Therefore, OC=OD=OA=x+12 units.

Now, OB=x(x+12)=x12.

So, by the Pythagoras Theorem, we have

BD2=OD2OB2=(x+12)2(x12)2=4x4=x

This shows that BD=x.

This construction gives us a visual, and geometric way of showing that x exists for all real numbers x>0. If you want to know the position of x on the number line, then let us treat the line BC as the number line, with B as zero, C as 1 , and so on. Draw an arc with centre B and radius BD, which intersects the number line in E (see Fig. 1.13). Then, E represents x.

Fig. 1.13

We would like to now extend the idea of square roots to cube roots, fourth roots, and in general nth roots, where n is a positive integer. Recall your understanding of square roots and cube roots from earlier classes.

What is 83 ? Well, we know it has to be some positive number whose cube is 8 , and you must have guessed 83=2. Let us try 2435. Do you know some number b such that b5=243 ? The answer is 3 . Therefore, 2435=3.

From these examples, can you define an for a real number a>0 and a positive integer n ?

Let a>0 be a real number and n be a positive integer. Then an=b, if bn=a and b>0. Note that the symbol ’ ’ used in 2,83,an, etc. is called the radical sign.

We now list some identities relating to square roots, which are useful in various ways. You are already familiar with some of these from your earlier classes. The remaining ones follow from the distributive law of multiplication over addition of real numbers, and from the identity (x+y)(xy)=x2y2, for any real numbers x and y.

Let a and b be positive real numbers. Then

(i) ab=ab

(ii) ab=ab

(iii) (a+b)(ab)=ab

(iv) (a+b)(ab)=a2b

(v) (a+b)(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd

(vi) (a+b)2=a+2ab+b

Let us look at some particular cases of these identities.

Example 15 : Simplify the following expressions:

(i) (5+7)(2+5)

(ii) (5+5)(55)

(iii) (3+7)2

(iv) (117)(11+7)

Solution : (i) (5+7)(2+5)=10+55+27+35

(ii) (5+5)(55)=52(5)2=255=20

(iii) (3+7)2=(3)2+237+(7)2=3+221+7=10+221

(iv) (117)(11+7)=(11)2(7)2=117=4

Remark : Note that ‘simplify’ in the example above has been used to mean that the expression should be written as the sum of a rational and an irrational number.

We end this section by considering the following problem. Look at 12. Can you tell where it shows up on the number line? You know that it is irrational. May be it is easier to handle if the denominator is a rational number. Let us see, if we can ‘rationalise’ the denominator, that is, to make the denominator into a rational number. To do so, we need the identities involving square roots. Let us see how.

Example 16 : Rationalise the denominator of 12.

Solution : We want to write 12 as an equivalent expression in which the denominator is a rational number. We know that 22 is rational. We also know that multiplying 12 by 22 will give us an equivalent expression, since 22=1. So, we put these two facts together to get

12=12×22=22

In this form, it is easy to locate 12 on the number line. It is half way between 0 and 2.

Example 17 : Rationalise the denominator of 12+3.

Solution : We use the Identity (iv) given earlier. Multiply and divide12+3 by 23 to get

12+3×2323=2343=23.

Example 18 : Rationalise the denominator of 535.

Solution : Here we use the Identity (iii) given earlier.

So, 535=535×3+53+5=5(3+5)35=(52)(3+5)

Example 19 : Rationalise the denominator of 17+32.

Solution : 17+32=17+32×(732732)=7324918=73231

So, when the denominator of an expression contains a term with a square root (or a number under a radical sign), the process of converting it to an equivalent expression whose denominator is a rational number is called rationalising the denominator.

EXERCISE 1.4

1. Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational:

(i) 25

(ii) (3+23)23

(iii) 2777

(iv) 12

(v) 2π

Show Answer

Solution

(i) 25=22.2360679

=0.2360679

As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number.

(ii)

(3+23)23=3=31 number. form, therefore, it is a 

As it can be represented in pq

(iii) 2777=27 : 2777=27, which is a rational number.

(iv) 12=22=0.7071067811

As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number. ( v)

2п=2(3.1415)

=6.2830

As the decimal expansion of this expression is non-terminating non-recurring, therefore, it is an irrational number.

2. Simplify each of the following expressions:

(i) (3+3)(2+2)

(ii) (3+3)(33)

(iii) (5+2)2

(iv) (52)(5+2)

Show Answer

Solution

(3+3)(2+2)=3(2+2)+3(2+2)=6+32+23+6(3+3)(33)=(3)2(3)2 (ii) =93=6 (iii) (5+2)2=(5)2+(2)2+2(5)(2)=5+2+210=7+210 (iv) (52)(5+2)=(5)2(2)2=52=3

3. Recall, π is defined as the ratio of the circumference (say c ) of a circle to its diameter (say d ). That is, π=cd. This seems to contradict the fact that π is irrational. How will you resolve this contradiction?

Show Answer

Solution

There is no contradiction. When we measure a length with scale or any other instrument, we only obtain an approximate rational value. We never obtain an exact value. For this reason, we may not realise that either c or d is irrational. Therefore,

the cd fraction is irrational. Hence, π is irrational.

4. Represent 9.3 on the number line.

Show Answer

Solution

Mark a line segment OB=9.3 on number line. Further, take BC of 1 unit. Find the midpoint D of OC and draw a semi-circle on OC while taking D as its centre. Draw a

(i)

17=1×71×7=77

perpendicular to line OC passing through point B. Let it intersect the semi-circle at E.

Taking B as centre and BE as radius, draw an arc in tersecting number line at F. BF is 9.3.

5. Rationalise the denominators of the following:

(i) 17

(ii) 176

(iii) 15+2

(iv) 172

Show Answer

Solution

(i)

6412=(26)12=22=4=26×12[(am)n=amm!](16)34=(24)34(iii)=23=8

=25×23[(am)n=ammn]

(ii)

3215=(25)15=(2)5×15=21=2

=24×34[(am)n=amm][(am)n=amm](125)13(iv)=1(125)13=23=8

(125)13=(53)13

=53×13[(am)n=amm]=153×13=51=5=15

[am=1am]

1.5 Laws of Exponents for Real Numbers

Do you remember how to simplify the following?

(i) 172175=

(ii) (52)7=

(iii) 2310237=

(iv) 7393=

Did you get these answers? They are as follows:

(i) 172175=177

(ii) (52)7=514

(iii) 2310237=233

(iv) 7393=633

To get these answers, you would have used the following laws of exponents, which you have learnt in your earlier classes. (Here a,n and m are natural numbers. Remember, a is called the base and m and n are the exponents.)

(i) aman=am+n

(ii) (am)n=amn

(iii) aman=amn,m>n

(iv) ambm=(ab)m

What is (a)0 ? Yes, it is 1 ! So you have learnt that (a)0=1. So, using (iii), we can get 1an=an. We can now extend the laws to negative exponents too.

So, for example :

(i) 172175=173=1173

(ii) (52)7=514

(iii) 2310237=2317

(iv) (7)3(9)3=(63)3

Suppose we want to do the following computations:

(i) 223213

(ii) (315)4

(iii) 715713

(iv) 13151715

How would we go about it? It turns out that we can extend the laws of exponents that we have studied earlier, even when the base is a positive real number and the exponents are rational numbers. (Later you will study that it can further to be extended when the exponents are real numbers.) But before we state these laws, and to even make sense of these laws, we need to first understand what, for example 432 is. So, we have some work to do!

We define an for a real number a>0 as follows:

Let a>0 be a real number and n a positive integer. Then an=b, if bn=a and b>0.

In the language of exponents, we define an=a1n. So, in particular, 23=213. There are now two ways to look at 432.

432=(412)3=23=8432=(43)12=(64)12=8

Therefore, we have the following definition:

Let a>0 be a real number. Let m and n be integers such that m and n have no common factors other than 1 , and n>0. Then,

amn=(an)m=amn

We now have the following extended laws of exponents:

Let a>0 be a real number and p and q be rational numbers. Then, we have

(i) apaq=ap+q

(ii) (ap)q=apq

(iii) apaq=apq

(iv) apbp=(ab)p

You can now use these laws to answer the questions asked earlier.

Example 20 : Simplify (i) 223213

(ii) (315)4

(iii) 715713

(iv) 13151715

Solution : (i) 223213=2(23+13)=233=21=2

(ii) (315)4=345

(iii) 715713=7(1513)=73515=7215

(iv) 13151715=(13×17)15=22115

EXERCISE 1.5

1. Find :

(i) 6412

(ii) 3215

(iii) 12513

Show Answer

Solution

(i)

6412=(26)12=22=4=26×12[(am)n=amm!](16)34=(24)34(iii)=23=8

=25×23[(am)n=ammn]

2. Find:

(i) 932

(ii) 3225

(iii) 1634

(iv) 12513

Show Answer

Solution

(ii)

3215=(25)15=(2)5×15=21=2

=24×34[(am)n=amm][(am)n=amm](125)13(iv)=1(125)13=23=8

(125)13=(53)13

=53×13[(am)n=amm]=153×13=51=5=15

[am=1am]

3. Simplify:

(i) 223215

(ii) (133)7

(iii) 11121114

(iv) 712812

Show Answer

Solution

(i)

223215=223+15[aman=am+n]=210+315=21315

(ii)

(133)7=133×7[(am)n=amm]=1321[1am=am]

(iii)

11121114=111214[aman=amn]=11214=1114

(iv)

712812=(7×8)12[ambm=(ab)m]=(56)12

1.6 Summary

In this chapter, you have studied the following points:

1. A number r is called a rational number, if it can be written in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

2. A number s is called a irrational number, if it cannot be written in the form pq, where p and q are integers and q0.

3. The decimal expansion of a rational number is either terminating or non-terminating recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is terminating or non-terminating recurring is rational.

4. The decimal expansion of an irrational number is non-terminating non-recurring. Moreover, a number whose decimal expansion is non-terminating non-recurring is irrational.

5. All the rational and irrational numbers make up the collection of real numbers.

6. If r is rational and s is irrational, then r+s and rs are irrational numbers, and rs and rs are irrational numbers, r0.

7. For positive real numbers a and b, the following identities hold:

(i) ab=ab

(ii) ab=ab

(iii) (a+b)(ab)=ab

(iv) (a+b)(ab)=a2b

(v) (a+b)2=a+2ab+b

8. To rationalise the denominator of 1a+b, we multiply this by abab, where a and b are integers.

9. Let a>0 be a real number and p and q be rational numbers. Then

(i) apaq=ap+q

(ii) (ap)q=apq

(iii) apaq=apq

(iv) apbp=(ab)p