SEBI Issues Warning to Paytm Over Related Party Transactions

SEBI Issues Warning to Paytm Over Related Party Transactions

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued an administrative warning to One 97 Communications, the parent company of Paytm, over certain transactions conducted between Paytm and the now-defunct Paytm Payments Bank (PPBL) in the financial year 2021-22. The warning was issued due to the lack of approval from the company’s audit committee or shareholders for these transactions, which were valued at ₹324 crore and ₹36 crore respectively.

According to SEBI, the transactions did not have formal approvals and were not categorized as material related party transactions (RPTs) by the company. However, the Board and Audit Committee of One 97 Communications considered these transactions as material RPTs and passed a resolution to ensure that such transactions would be within the limits specified in the resolution. This discrepancy has raised concerns about the company’s compliance with SEBI’s listing regulations.

SEBI has instructed Paytm to present the letter to its board for corrective actions and to provide a report on the measures taken within 10 days. The regulator has also warned that failure to improve compliance standards could lead to the initiation of appropriate enforcement action. Paytm’s shares dropped 2% to Rs 461.1 during Tuesday’s trading session on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) following the announcement.

In response to the warning, Paytm has stated that it has consistently adhered to SEBI’s listing regulations and is committed to upholding the highest compliance standards. The company has emphasized its longstanding adherence to regulatory requirements and commitment to transparency and integrity in all its operations. Paytm has assured that the warning will not affect its financial, operational, or other activities and is taking steps to address SEBI’s concerns and enhance compliance protocols to prevent such issues in the future.

The company has reiterated its commitment to maintaining transparency and integrity in all its operations, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and the highest standards of corporate governance. Paytm has also promised to provide a comprehensive response to SEBI’s concerns and maintain open communication with the regulatory body.

This incident highlights the importance of compliance with regulatory requirements and the need for companies to maintain transparency and integrity in their operations. It also underscores the importance of effective corporate governance and the need for companies to ensure that their transactions are properly approved and categorized.

For students preparing for competitive exams, this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of regulatory compliance and the need for companies to maintain transparency and integrity in their operations. It also highlights the importance of effective corporate governance and the need for companies to ensure that their transactions are properly approved and categorized.

Key Takeaways:

  • SEBI issued an administrative warning to One 97 Communications over related party transactions between Paytm and PPBL.
  • The transactions were valued at ₹324 crore and ₹36 crore respectively and did not have formal approvals.
  • SEBI has instructed Paytm to present the letter to its board for corrective actions and to provide a report on the measures taken within 10 days.
  • Paytm has assured that the warning will not affect its financial, operational, or other activities and is taking steps to address SEBI’s concerns and enhance compliance protocols.
  • The company has reiterated its commitment to maintaining transparency and integrity in all its operations, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and the highest standards of corporate governance.

Historical Context:

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is the primary regulator of the securities market in India, responsible for protecting the interests of investors and maintaining fair and orderly markets. SEBI was established in 1988 and has been instrumental in promoting transparency, accountability, and corporate governance in the Indian corporate sector. Over the years, SEBI has issued various regulations and guidelines to ensure compliance with listing requirements, insider trading, and other market-related issues.

In recent years, SEBI has taken several measures to strengthen corporate governance and ensure transparency in corporate dealings. One such measure is the requirement for companies to disclose related-party transactions (RPTs) and obtain necessary approvals from the audit committee and shareholders. This is aimed at preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring that companies maintain transparency in their operations.

The warning issued to Paytm is a reminder of the importance of compliance with regulatory requirements and the need for companies to maintain transparency and integrity in their operations. It also underscores the importance of effective corporate governance and the need for companies to ensure that their transactions are properly approved and categorized.

Summary in Bullet Points:

• SEBI issued an administrative warning to One 97 Communications (Paytm’s parent company) over related-party transactions between Paytm and Paytm Payments Bank (PPBL) in FY 2021-22. • The transactions were valued at ₹324 crore and ₹36 crore respectively and did not have formal approvals. • SEBI instructed Paytm to present the letter to its board for corrective actions and provide a report on measures taken within 10 days. • Paytm assured that the warning will not affect its financial, operational, or other activities and is taking steps to address SEBI’s concerns and enhance compliance protocols. • Paytm reiterated its commitment to maintaining transparency and integrity in all its operations, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and highest standards of corporate governance. • The incident highlights the importance of compliance with regulatory requirements, transparency, and integrity in corporate operations. • It also underscores the importance of effective corporate governance and proper approval and categorization of transactions.



Table of Contents