Def: A pt. c in the domain of f(x) is called a pt. of local maxima if there exist h>0 such f(c)⩾f(x)∀x∈(c−h,c+h)
(ie. f(c) is the max. value of f(x) is some small enough interval (c−h,c+h) containing the pt.c )
similarly :
c is called a pt. of local minima if ∃h>0 sit. f(c)≤f(x)∀x∈(c−h,c+h)
c1 is a pt. of local maxima.
c2.. .. . . . minima.
C3 is ". ". .. "I maxima.
c4. . . .. . minima.
Theorem: If c is a point of local maxima or local minima, then either f′(c)=0 or f′(c) does not exist.
Theorem (First Derivative Test):
Let f(x) be a function defined on an open interval I.
(i) If f′(x) changes sign from +ve to -ve, so we move across c, then c is a pt. of local minima.
(ii) If f′(x) changes sign from - ve to +ve as we move across c, than c is a pt. of local minima.
(iii) If f′(x) does not change sign as we move across c, then c is neither a pt. of local max. nor a pt. of local min.
So, to find pts. of local min. R local max. we find the critical pts (ie. it where f′(x)=0 or f′(x) does not exist)
and then we can use the first derivative test to determine whether those pt. are points of local max, local min. or neither.
eg. f(x)=x3 on R.
f′(x)=3x2
Thus, f′(x)=0⇔x=0 ie. 0 is th a on 6 critical
Since f′(x)=3x2>0∀x>0
f′(x) does not change sign do we move actors x=0
sq x=0 is neither a pt. of local max. nor a pt. of local min.
Such a pt. which is a critical pt. but is neither a pt. of local max nor local min is called an inflection point.
Find the pts. of local maxima and local minima of
f(x)=x3−3x+3f′(x)=3x2−3=3(x2−1)=3(x−1)(x+1)f′(x)=0⇔x=−1 or x=1
Thus, x=−1 is a pt. of local maxima & x=1 is a pt. of local minima.
g(x)=2x3−6x2+6x+5
g′(x)=6x2−12x+6
=6(x2−2x+1)=6(x−1)2
x=1 is a critical pt.
But g′(x)>0 as we move across x=1
therefore x=1 is a point of inflection for g(x).
(neither a local maxima nor a local minima) g(x) has no local max. or local min.
Let's look at f(x)=x2
f′(x)=2x So, x=0 is the only critical point.
By the first derivative test to see that x=0 is a pt. of local minima.
For g(x)=−x2,x=0 is a pt. of local maxima
f′′(x)=2, g′′(x)=−2
Theorem: Suppose f(x) is a fraction which is twice differentiable on an open interval I. Also, suppose f′(c)=0. Then
(i) If f′′(c)>0 then c is a pt. of local min.
(ii) If f′′(c)<0 then c is a pt. of local max.
(iii) If f′′(c)=0 then the test fails (ie. we cannot conclude anything if f′′(c)=0 )
Consider f(x)=x4,g(x)=−x4
Then f′(0)=0=g′(0)
Also, f′′(0)=0=g′′(0)
We can see by the first derivative test or by direct observation that f(x) has a local min. at x=0 whereas g(x) has a local max. at x=0.
consider h(x)=x3,h′(x)=3x2,h′′(x)=6x
h′(0)=0,h′′(0)=0
Here x=0 ' is neither a local max. nor a local min.
So, if the second derivative f′′(c)=0 at a critical pt. c, then we can have all possible cases. In such case we may try to use the first derivative test.
Proof of second derivative test:
(i) Suppose f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)<0
Claim: c is a pt. of local minima.
for this we need to find
h>0 such that f(c)⩽f(x)∀x∈(c−h,c+h).
By the definition of derivative,
f′′(c)=limx→c
x−cf′(x)−f′(c)⋅ But f′(c)=0
∴limx→cx−cf′(x)=f′′(c)>0
⇒∃h>0 set. x−cf′(x)>0
for all x∈(c−h,c+h),x=c
⇒ if x∈(c,c+h) then f′(x)>0
[∴Denominator x−c>0]
∴ By the list derivative test, x=c is a pt. of local minima.
(ii) If f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)<0, then x=c is a pt. of local max. can be proved in a similar way.
Find the pts. of local min. and local max of
f(x)=3x4+4x3−12x2+12.
f′(x)=12x3+12x2−24x
f′′(x)=36x2+24x−24
Critical pts: f′(x)=0 ⇔ 12x(x2+x−2)=0
⇔12x(x−1)(x+2)=0
⇔ x=0 or 1 or -2
f′′(x)=36x2+24x−24
Now, f′′(0)=−24<0⇒x=0 is a pt. of local max.
f′′(1)=36+24−24=36>0
⇒x=1 is a pt. of local min.
f′′(−2)=12[3(−2)2+2(−2)−2]
=12[12−4−2]>0
⇒x=−2 is a pt. of local min.
So, x=0 is a point of local max. x=−2&x=1 are pt. of local min.
f(0)=12 ; f(1)=7 ; f(−2)=−20
f(x)=x+x1,x=0
Find pts. of local min. and local max.
f′(x)=1−x21⇒x=±1 are critical points
f′′(x)=x22
f′′(1)=2>0⇒x=1 is a pt. of local minima
f′′(−1)=−2<0⇒x=−1 is a point. of local maxima