(a,b)∈R⇒(b,a)∈R
R={(x,y)∈A×A∣the difference between x and y is an odd number }
R={(1,2),(1,4),(2,1),(2,3),(2,5),(3,2),
(3,4),(4,1),(4,3),(4,5),(5,2),(5,4)}
∴ R is a symmetric relation
Let A={1,2,3,4,5,6}
R={(n,m)∈A×A∣n divides m}
={(1,1),(1,2),(1,3),(1,4),(1,5),(1,6)
(2,2),(2,4),(2,6),(3,3),(3,6),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6)}
(1,2)∈R but (2,1)∈R
(2,6)∈R but (6,2)∈R
⇒R is not a symmetric relation.
Let A={1,2,3,4,5}
x=P(A)= Set of all subsets of A
Define a relation R on X as follows:
(A1, A2) ∈R if A1 ⊆ A2
{2} ⊆ A & {2,3} ⊆ A
{2} ⊆ {2,3} ⇒ ({2}, {2,3}) ∈ R.
{2,3} ⊆ {2} ⇒ ({2,3}, {2}) ∈ R
∴R is not symmetric.
Let A be a non empty set and let R be a relation from A to itself. We say that R is reflexive if the pair (a,a)∈ R for all a ∈ R.
X=P(A)
R={(A1, A2)∈ P(A)xP(A)}∣A1⊆A2}
If B⊆A ⇒ (B, B)∈ R
∴ R is reflexive
{(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5)}⊆R
⇒ R is reflexive
R={(n,m) |m=n2}
(1,1)∈ R but (2,2)∉ R ⇒ R is not reflexive.
(2,4) ∈ R but (4,2)∉ R
⇒ R is not symmetric.
Let A be a non empty set and let R be a relation from A to itself. We say that R is transitive if the following holds
(a,b) & (b,c)∈ R ⇒ (a,c) ∈ R.
A= {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
R={(n,m) ∈ A × A|n divides m}.
(2,4) ∈ R & (4,8) ∈ R
(2,8) ∈ R
n divides m and m divides k
⇒ n divides k.
∴ R is transitive
A={1,2,3,4,5}
X=P(A)
R={(A1, A2) ∈ P(A) × P(A) |A1 ⊆ A2}
(A1, A2) ∈ R and (A2, A3) ∈ R
⇒ A1 ⊆ A2 and A2 ⊆ A3
A1 ⊆ A2 ⊆ A3
A1 ⊆ A3 i.e, (A1, A3)∈ R
∴ R is transitive.
A={1,2,3,4,5}
R ={(n,m) |the difference between n and m is an odd number}
(n,m) ∈ R and (m,k) ∈ R ⇒ (n,k) ∈ R
(1,2) ∈ R & (2,3) ∈ R
But (1,3)∈/ R
∴ R is not transitive
Definition A relation R from a non empty set A to itself is called an equivalence relation if
R is symmetric
R is reflexive &
R is transitive
A={1,2,3,4,5}
R= {(n,m)| n divides m}
R is not symmetric ⇒ R is not an equivalence relation
R is reflexive
R is transitive
A= {1,2,3,4,5}
x=P(A)
R={(A1, A2) ∈ P(A) × P(A)|A1 ⊆ A2}
R is not symmetric ⇒ R is not an equivalence relation.
R is reflexive
R is transitive
Let Z denote the set of all integers. Define R on Z as follows:
(n,m) ∈ R if n≡ m (mod 9)
i.e, n-m is divisible by 9
Show that, R is an equivalence relation.
i) Suppose (n,m) ∈ R
i.e, n≡ m (mod 9)
i.e, n-m is divisible by 9
i.e, there exists an integer k such that n-m = k.9
⇒ m-n=-k.9
⇒ m- n is divisible by 9.
⇒ m≡n (mod 9)
⇒ (m,n)∈ R.
∴ R is symmetric.
ii) Let n ∈ Z
n-n=0=0.9
⇒ n≡n (mod 9)
⇒ (n,n) ∈ R
i.e, R is reflexive
iii) Let (n, m) ∈ R and (m, r)∈ R
(n, m)∈ R ⇒ n ≡ m (mod 9)
⇒ n - m is divisible by 9
⇒ There exists k ∈ Z such that n - m = k.9 ⟶(1)
(m, r)∈ R ⇒ m ≡ r (mod 9)
⇒ m - r is divisible by 9
⇒ There exists p ∈ Z such that m - r =pq ⟶(2)
n - m = k 9 m - r = p 9
n - r = n - m + m - r
= (n - m ) + (m - r)
= k 9 + p 9 =(k + p). 9
⇒
n - r = (k + p) 9
⇒ n - r is divisible by 9
i.e, n ≡ r (mod 9) ⇒ (n, r) ∈ R
∴ R is an equivalence relation
Let A={Δ’s |Δ is a triangle in R2}
R = {(Δ1, Δ2) ∈ A×A |Δ1 is congruent to Δ2}
Show that, R is an equivalence relation.
ii) Every triangle is congruent to itself R is reflexive.
iii) Suppose (Δ1, Δ2) ∈ R and (Δ2, Δ3)∈ R
(Δ1, Δ2) ∈ R ⇒ Δ1 is congruent to Δ2 ⟶ (i)
Similarly (Δ2, Δ3) ∈ R ⇒ Δ2 is congruent to Δ3 ⟶ (ii)
(i) & (ii) ⇒ Δ1 is congruent to Δ3 ⇒ (Δ1, Δ3) ∈ R
∴ R is an equivalence relation.
A= {Δ |Δ is a 2 - dimensional triangle}
R ={(Δ1, Δ2)∈ A×A |Δ1 is similar to Δ2)}
Here, R is an equivalence relation (same proof as in the previous example).
Let
A = {A|A is a finite set}
Define R on A as follows:
(A, B) ∈ R ,If the number of elements in A is equal to the number of elements in B.
R = {(A, B)∈ A×A | #(A) = #(B)}
Show that R is an equivalence relation.
i) Let (A, B)∈ R ⇒ #(A) = #(B)
⇒ #(B) = #(A) ⇒ (B, A)∈ R
∴ R is symmetric.
ii) Let A be a finite set
#(A)=#(A) ⇒ (A, A)∈ R
∴ R is reflexive
iii) Let (A, B)∈ R and (B, C)∈ R
(A, B)∈ R ⇒ #(A) = #(B) ⟶(1)
similarly (B, C)∈ R ⇒ #(B) = #(C) ⟶(2)
By (1) & (2) we have #(A)= #(C)
∴ R is transitive.
Thus, R is an equivalence relation:
Let A = R2 \ {(0, 0)}-punctured plane
R = {((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) ∈ A×A |there exists a non-zero scaler λ∈R such that (x1, y1) = λ (x2, y2)}
Show that R is an equivalence relation.
i) Let ((x1, y1), (x2, y2))∈ R
⇒ there exists 0 ≠ λ ∈ R such that (x1, y1) = λ(x2, y2)
⇒ λ1 (x1, y1) = (x2, y2)
⇒ (x2, y2) = λ1 (x1, y1)
⇒ ((x2, y2), (x1, y1))∈ R
∴ R is symmetric.
ii) Let (x1, y1)∈ A
(x1, y1) = 1.(x1, y1)
⇒ ((x1, y1), (x1, y1)) ∈ R
∴ R is reflexive.
iii) Let ((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) ∈ R & ((x2, y2), (x3, y3)) ∈ R
((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) ∈ R
⇒ there exists 0 ≠ λ ∈ R such that (x1, y1) = λ (x2, y2) ⟶ (1)
similarly ((x2, y2), (x3, y3)) ∈R
⇒ there exists 0≠β ∈ R such that (x2, y2) = β (x3, y3) ⟶ (2)
Substituting (2) in (1), we get
(x1, y1) = λ (x2, y2)
= λ.β (x3, y3)
= (λβ) (x3, y3)
⇒ ((x1, y1), (x3, y3)) ∈R
∴ R is transitive
Thus, R is an equivalence relation.
For any two distinct elements x & y in R, one & only one of the following holds:
i) [x]R = [y]R
ii) [x]R ∩ [y]R = ϕ