Two renowned international Software companies, namely Pollaris and Contigent, started their business in the year 2007 and both the companies were in competition with each other in profit making. Pollaris earned 30 per cent prof it in the year 2007 and 2008, and further increased it to 40 per cent in 2009 . However, its prof it percentage decreased to 20 per cent in the year 2010. On the other hand, Contigent opened with 40 per cent profit in 2007, but slowly decreased to 35 per cent in 2008 and 30 per cent in 2009 . Interestingly, both the companies increased their profit percentage in the later year considerably. Pollaris increased its profit percentage to 35 per cent in 2011 and 50 per cent in 2012; simultaneously, Contigent increased its profit percentage to 45 per cent in 2010, 50 per cent in 2011 and reached 60 per cent in the year 2012. As there is a need to understand the income and expenditure for the better performance of both companies in the future, answer the following questions.
======
(A) 10 %
(B) 20 %
(C) 15 %
(D) Cannot be determined.
(A) 113.3 %
(B) 95.3 %
(C) 90.3 %
(D) 133.3 %
(A) ₹ 21.5 Crore
(B) ₹ 46.15 Crore
(C) ₹ 153 Crore
(A) 5.17
(B) 8.33
(C) 9.17
(D) 4.33
(A) 42.86
(B) 75
(C) 175
A newly formed state government wants to bring more development in the state. Therefore, the government proposed to launch various welfare programmes. Before bringing up any welfare programme, the state government intended to understand the population percentage of the state by age groups, so that the government could plan the welfare programmes accordingly. The state government found that the state’s 30 per cent of the population were children between the age group of $0-15$. Next to child population, 17.75 per cent of the population were adolescents between the age group of 16 and 25 . The early adult population, i.e., the age groups 26 to 35 were 17.25 per cent, 36 to 45 were 14.50 per cent, respectively. The population who are between the age group of 46 to 55 constitute 14.25 per cent and the elderly population of the state, i.e., 56 to $65(5.12 %)$ and 66 above (1.13%) was comparatively less than the other age groups. To get a better clarity, the state government concerned is seeking the answers to following questions:
(A) 2515
(B) 1746
(C) 1660
(D) 2674
(A) 32.72 million
(B) 25.75 million
(C) 31.50 million
(D) 59.30 million
(A) 15.6 million
(B) 12.18 million
(C) 28.4 million
(D) 34.7 million
(A) 360.23 million
(B) 390 million
(C) 400 million
(D) 525 million
(A) 16 to 25
(B) 26 to 35
(C) 36 to 45
(D) None of the above.
COVID-19 pandemic turned life upside-down for many families across the world. Mr. Abhishek was working as a sale executive in a famous Marketing Company. Due to COVID19 pandemic lockdown and restrictions, Mr. Abhishek was not able to achieve his monthly targets which resulted in the reduction of his salary. So far, he spent his income lavishly without any planning and prior calculations. However, the prevailing situation compelled him to plan his expenditure to adjust his life to the present income. Therefore, he analysed his spendings of last year i.e., 2019, so that he can plan his present year 2020 spendings. Through his brief analysis, he found that in the year 2019, he spent 23 per cent of his income on food, 15 per cent on Housing, and 12 per cent on his child’s education. For his transport, he spent 10 per cent, and for clothing of his family he spent 10 per cent. In the meanwhile, Mr. Abishek also saved 15 per cent of his income in the year 2019, and the remaining 20 per cent of expenditure he kept as other spendings. Answer the following questions to provide deeper insight to Mr. Abhishek.
(A) ₹ 12,000
(B) ₹ 12,880
(C) ₹ 23,880
(D) ₹ 23,000
(A) ₹ 11,500
(B) ₹ 12,500
(C) ₹ 14,000
(D) ₹ 15,000
(A) 5: 2
(B) 2: 5
(C) 4: 5
(D) 5: 4
(A) ₹ 8,400
(B) ₹ 5,600
(C) ₹ 6,900
(D) ₹ 3,067
(A) Housing and Child Education
(B) Food and Transport
(C) Food and Housing
(D) Housing and Saving