Big Charge Against Siddaramaiah’s Wife Amid Mysuru Land Compensation Row

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife, Parvathi, has been accused of being involved in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam by a social activist, Snehamayi Krishna. Krishna has filed a police complaint against Parvathi, Siddaramaiah, and two others, alleging that they were involved in irregularities in the land allotment process. The activist claims that Parvathi received 38,283 square feet of prime real estate in south Mysuru in 2021 as compensation for land that was acquired by MUDA for development.

According to Krishna, the land was originally bought by Parvathi’s brother, Mallikarjuna, in 2004 and gifted to her in 2010. However, the land was already denotified, and Mallikarjuna allegedly used forged documents to register the land with the help of government and revenue officials. The land was then shown to have been bought in 1998. Parvathi sought compensation for the land in 2014, when Siddaramaiah was the Chief Minister.

Siddaramaiah has responded to the allegations by saying that his wife received compensation when the BJP was in power, and it was her right. He claimed that the BJP is trying to deflect attention from their own wrongdoings and that his wife’s compensation was legitimate. “They (BJP) are the ones who gave the site, now if they call it illegal, how should one respond? They took away our land and parks were made there, and those sites were allocated to others. Should we give up our land because I am the Chief Minister?” he said.

The BJP has demanded a CBI investigation into the alleged irregularities and has questioned the compensation provided to Parvathi. Leader of Opposition in the Assembly, R Ashoka, said, “The land was acquired by MUDA and then denotified. I don’t know on whose pressure it was done. After the denotification, MUDA formed a layout, park, and playground on that land. This gives rise to many doubts because once it is denotified, MUDA has no right to touch that piece of land, which belongs to a reputed person. Yet, the layout was formed.”

HD Kumaraswamy, Union minister and leader of BJP ally JDS, has claimed that the MUDA row is an outcome of a power struggle between Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy, D K Shivakumar. The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.

Key Points:

• A social activist has filed a police complaint against Parvathi and others, alleging involvement in the MUDA scam.
• Parvathi received 38,283 square feet of prime real estate in south Mysuru as compensation for land acquired by MUDA.
• The activist claims that the land was bought by Parvathi’s brother in 2004 and gifted to her in 2010, using forged documents.
• Siddaramaiah has denied any wrongdoing, saying his wife received compensation when the BJP was in power.
• The BJP has demanded a CBI investigation into the alleged irregularities.
• The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.

Why it matters:

• The controversy highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings.
• It raises questions about the role of influential people in the allocation of government land and resources.
• It also highlights the importance of fact-checking and verifying information before making accusations.

What to remember:

• The controversy is centered around the alleged MUDA scam and the compensation provided to Parvathi.
• Siddaramaiah has denied any wrongdoing, while the BJP has demanded a CBI investigation.
• The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.

What to look out for:

• Further developments in the investigation and the outcome of the police complaint.
• Reactions from other political parties and stakeholders.
• The impact of the controversy on the reputation of Siddaramaiah and the Congress party.

Historical Context:

The Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) has been involved in several controversies in the past, including allegations of corruption and irregularities in land allotment and development projects. In 2019, the Karnataka High Court ordered the MUDA to cancel the allotment of a plot of land to a private company, citing irregularities in the process. In 2020, the MUDA was accused of embezzling funds meant for the development of infrastructure projects in Mysuru.

In the context of the current controversy, it is worth noting that the BJP has been critical of the Congress government in Karnataka, led by Siddaramaiah, on issues of corruption and governance. The party has been trying to capitalize on the controversy to tarnish the image of the Chief Minister and his government.

Summary in Bullet Points:

• A social activist has filed a police complaint against Parvathi, the wife of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, alleging involvement in the MUDA scam.
• Parvathi received 38,283 square feet of prime real estate in south Mysuru as compensation for land acquired by MUDA.
• The activist claims that the land was bought by Parvathi’s brother in 2004 and gifted to her in 2010, using forged documents.
• Siddaramaiah has denied any wrongdoing, saying his wife received compensation when the BJP was in power.
• The BJP has demanded a CBI investigation into the alleged irregularities.
• The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.
• The controversy highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings.
• It raises questions about the role of influential people in the allocation of government land and resources.
• It also highlights the importance of fact-checking and verifying information before making accusations.

Key Points:

• A social activist has filed a police complaint against Parvathi and others, alleging involvement in the MUDA scam.
• Parvathi received 38,283 square feet of prime real estate in south Mysuru as compensation for land acquired by MUDA.
• The activist claims that the land was bought by Parvathi’s brother in 2004 and gifted to her in 2010, using forged documents.
• Siddaramaiah has denied any wrongdoing, saying his wife received compensation when the BJP was in power.
• The BJP has demanded a CBI investigation into the alleged irregularities.
• The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.

Why it matters:

• The controversy highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings.
• It raises questions about the role of influential people in the allocation of government land and resources.
• It also highlights the importance of fact-checking and verifying information before making accusations.

What to remember:

• The controversy is centered around the alleged MUDA scam and the compensation provided to Parvathi.
• Siddaramaiah has denied any wrongdoing, while the BJP has demanded a CBI investigation.
• The controversy has sparked a heated debate, with both sides trading accusations and counter-accusations.

What to look out for:

• Further developments in the investigation and the outcome of the police complaint.
• Reactions from other political parties and stakeholders.
• The impact of the controversy on the reputation of Siddaramaiah and the Congress party.